Hi Barry,
--On May 31, 2012 10:50:52 AM -0400 Barry Leiba <[email protected]>
wrote:
I'm not highly against it, but I think we already have too many
imap-related mailing lists. Gets difficult to know sometimes where to
post a question and if all the important people are reading the right
lists.
ACK.
That was my thinking in wanting to do this here (on imap5). But
because this list was chartered for a different purpose, there's
(reasonable) concern that there will be distractions in both
directions if we temporarily hijack it for this one.
I will probably propose to the IESG that we accept this as an
exception, and use the <[email protected]> list that's already
there. That fits better in its purpose, but puts a new WG mailing
list off of IETF premises. The IESG has stopped short of saying that
should never happen, but has a strong preference against it. So I
want everyone to be prepared in case we choose to create a new list.
Paul at IMC has transferred a number of lists over to IETF control. So
would it not make sense to create [email protected] and transfer over
ietf-imapext membership? Then we have one IETF controlled list going
forward.
--
Cyrus Daboo
_______________________________________________
imap5 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/imap5
