Ga�l Roualland wrote: > Alexey Melnikov a �crit : > > > > Paul Smith wrote: > > > > > At 13:41 31/05/2002 +0200, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: > > > >Say a mailbox has 1000 messages in it, and the highest UID is 1600. Which > > > >is the correct response? > > > > > > > >1 UID FETCH 1601:* FLAGS > > > >1 OK FETCH completed. > > > > > > > >or > > > > > > > >1 UID FETCH 1601:* FLAGS > > > >* 1000 FETCH (UID 1600 FLAGS (\Seen)) > > > >1 OK FETCH completed. > > > > > > The first one. > > > > No, the second one, because * is translated to 1600 for UIDs. > > Yes, "*" is translated for 1600, so that gives the range 1601:1600. > But does that have sense ?
Yes (below). > (general understanding is probably that the > second sequence number must be larger or equal to the first one, This was discussed several times before and the agreement was that "m:n" when m > n is the same as "n:m". This is true for both message numbers and UIDs. > but I can't find it in the RFC). I don't remember seeing this in the document, but I might be wrong. Mark should comment on this. Alexey Melnikov __________________________________________ R & D, ACI Worldwide/MessagingDirect Richmond, Surrey, UK Phone: +44 20 8332 4508 Home Page: http://orthanc.ab.ca/mel I speak for myself only, not for my employer. __________________________________________
