Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Precisely. As far as the RFC says, "1:2" and "2:1" are equivalent. > > It doesn't say this.. (as far as I can see). It's open to interpretation > from reading the RFC.
Exactly. ;) It says a:b means all the messages with MSNs/UIDs between a and b, inclusive. That's clear. It does not require that a<b. The absence of a requirement is also clear... more or less. Sometimes the non-requirement can be usefully mentioned. --Arnt
