On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:52:12 +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > 2595 looks worse. Making STARTTLS m-t-i means that the IMAP parts of 2595 > aren't informational any more. Perhaps 2595 needs to be reissued?
I admit that I'm not current on the politics, but from all appearances 2595 is Standards Track.
