Mark Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 10:52:12 +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > > 2595 looks worse. Making STARTTLS m-t-i means that the IMAP parts of 2595 > > aren't informational any more. Perhaps 2595 needs to be reissued? > > I admit that I'm not current on the politics, but from all appearances 2595 is > Standards Track.
Oops, you're right. Can't imagine how I made that mistake. --Arnt
