On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Cyrus Daboo wrote: >Hi Andreas, >--On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:58:39 PM +0100 Andreas Aardal Hanssen ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >the copy destination mailbox to determine the UIDs assigned to the copied >messages unless the server supports UIDPLUS (and quite a few do not). And >in the case of a hierarchy rename the client would have to do >CREATE/COPY/DELETE for each mailbox in the hierarchy (I would argue that >users expect the hierarchical rename behaviour rather than having just the >top-level mailbox renamed without the children).
I agree - I guess I deserve the flame. I had not considered hierarchical renaming to be a problem, nor the mentioned possibilities the server has for not always bumping UIDVALIDITY. Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen - Binc IMAP http://www.bincimap.andreas.hanssen.name/
