On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Mark Crispin wrote: >On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:36:38 +0100 (CET), Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: >reduction in network traffic to the client, at a cost of loss of confirmation >to the client that anything was actually deleted and expunged.
Then I think you don't understand my question.. Should STORE _always_ return an untagged FETCH response, even if the flags were _not_ updated? Yes, my blind eyes missed the fact that the command was "STORE n FLAGS" and not "STORE n +FLAGS", but my question remains unanswered. Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen - Binc IMAP http://www.bincimap.andreas.hanssen.name/
