On Mon, 28 Jan 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 00:22, Mark Crispin wrote:
> > "What should the client do if the server fails to return an untagged FETCH
> > response from STORE"?
> ..
> > Nevertheless, since the server should have sent the untagged FETCH
> > response, a cautious client would assume that the state of the flags is
> > undefined until such time as it receives an untagged FETCH."
> I'm not sure of other server implementations, but I'd think it usually
> means that the message has been expunged but client hasn't yet been
> notified about that (RFC2180). But then again, maybe it was just some
> temporary error.

I agree, hence my reference to "a cautious client".

-- Mark --

http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.

Reply via email to