>I do not believe that people should architect protocols or software
>implementations to compensate for the limitations of firewalls and NATs.

>Rather, it is up to the vendors of firewalls and NATs to build products that
>can accomodate the protocols and software that the firewall/NAT will carry.

But this is how Cisco inflicted NAT on us ...  Why should we expect
them to FIX the problem that they have forced us live with?

-- lyndon (the grumpy I-hate-NAT-and-Cisco-as-a-result-of-it bastard)

Reply via email to