On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:11:24AM +0100, Arnaud Taddei wrote: > >Me neither. My only point was that using STATUS to constantly check for > >new mails in multiple mailboxes is less resource (cpu, memory, network) > >intensive than using multiple connections with some server > >implementations. > > > Servers which are not capable of supporting multiple connections models > are suffering anyway today. Too many clients have legitimate and non > legitimate reasons of doing it.
Sure. And I don't think I've said anything that would indicate otherwise. The keyword in my comment above was *LESS* resource intensive. Using multiple connections may be light, but using STATUS may still be lighter.
