On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 22:44, Larry Osterman wrote: > Actually, the implementations that treat "subscribed" as an aspect of a > mailbox are broken. The spec explicitly requires that you be able to > subscribe to non-existant mailboxes, if "subscribed" is an attribute of > the mailbox, then you can't do that :)
No, it doesn't require being able to subscribe into non-existing folders. It requires that if subscribed folder is deleted, the subscription isn't.
