On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 17:09, Barry Leiba wrote: > Why? NEW-UIDVALIDITY doesn't exist now; Timo is defining it. As such, Timo gets > to propose the definition as HE wants it, not as the proverbial lazy implementer > might want it. I think he's proposing this: ..
Yes, exactly. I'm not against "NO [TRY-MOVE]" reply either, if renaming isn't reasonable for the server. Another problem came to my mind though: Should RENAME affect list of subscribed folders? Logically I'd say yes, but there's nothing in spec about that.
