On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 01:46, Larry Osterman wrote:
> You're missing my point.
> 
> This mailing list is about the PROTOCOL.  Discussions should be about
> are about what's best for the clients that are engineered to use the
> protocol and the servers that implement, not for those that are using
> subsets of the protocol.  As such, clients like OE and Evolution are
> poor choices to consider when discussing protocol design.

Ah, sure. I was getting off topic there (or earlier), I just meant that
"just make the server cache the bodystructure" may not be the best
behaviour for server in all cases.

Still, even if client does use BODYSTRUCTURE, I don't think it's optimal
behaviour to fetch it for all messages before it's actually needed.

> I think it was Lyndon who pointed out that it's the client that's best
> suited to determine if a message has attachments or not - the server
> will almost always get it wrong.

Right, it can't always say if the message has an attachment, but for
many cases it can say that it doesn't have attachment (Content-Type:
text/*).

But I think I'll just use custom message flags for this if I decide to
not use BODYSTRUCTURE.

Reply via email to