On 4 Mar 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: >On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 21:16, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: >> Again I have to ask for the motivations for this thread. I have a hunch, >> and correct me if I'm wrong: >Completely wrong, actually. I've been playing with Evolution's IMAP code
But ofcoursh I am. ;) >recently and I was thinking about supporting it there. Evolution uses >only one paperclip icon and using BODYSTRUCTURE just to find it feels so Can't see that it does.. >bloaty. Of course, if the current behaviour was kept it would fetch BODY >(or BODYSTRUCTURE) for all new uncached messages anyway and then save it >into cache, but I've been hoping to make it work well with no local >cache too. Actually, I tested with Evolution 1.0.8-1 and 1.2.2. 1.0.8-1 seems to enjoy fetching BODY[] for each shown message. That looks like a imap-over-pop artifact. Evolution 1.2.2 fetches this: <tag> UID FETCH <n> (FLAGS RFC822.SIZE INTERNALDATE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS.NOT (RECEIVED)]) That is - it fetches the whole header and not the BODYSTRUCTURE. It still shows the paperclip. When I click on a message, it still doesn't use BODYSTRUCTURE. It just fetches the whole message with BODY[]. Now that's one Fine(tm) IMAP client. Andy -- Andreas Aardal Hanssen - Binc IMAP http://www.bincimap.andreas.hanssen.name/
