Timo Sirainen wrote: > Also do you really have to return MODSEQ messageset for each SEARCH and > SORT? You're just returning the search results twice. Why not add the MODSEQ > into the untagged reply itself? ie. "* SEARCH 1 2 4 10 (MODSEQ 123)". Since > client specifically asked for the MODSEQ, there's no compatibility issues.
Actually I like the idea. I would rather change the syntax to "* SEARCH (MODSEQ 123) 1 2 4 10", so that you can recognize new syntax earlier in parsing. What do other people think? Cheers, Alexey __________________________________________ R & D, ACI Worldwide/MessagingDirect Watford, UK Work Phone: +44 1923 81 2877 Home Page: http://orthanc.ab.ca/mel I speak for myself only, not for my employer. __________________________________________
