On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote: > > If I do a LIST "" "INBOX/%", and I have no sub-mailboxes in my INBOX, > > "INBOX" does not match the pattern -- it is missing the trailing hierarchy > > separator. > > However, "INBOX/" does; and if INBOX is not \NoInferiors then that name > should be shown.
Where in RFC3501 does it say that the server needs to maintain this trailing-hierarchy-separator convention? I see that in section 6.3.3 it's used as a hint from the client to the server that future submailboxes be supported after a CREATE, but I don't see it discussed elsewhere. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski | Andrew Systems Group * Research Systems Programmer PGP:0x5CE32FCC | Cyert Hall 207 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 412.268.7456 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK---- Version: 3.12 GCS/IT/CM/PA d- s+: a-- C++++$ ULS++++$ P+++$ L+++(++++) E W+ N o? K- w O- M-- V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5+++ R@ tv-@ b+ DI+++ G e h r- y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
