On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Mark Crispin wrote: > I would think that "*" should always show all names.
On a server with dual-use mailboxes, I suspect that this would result in unexpected client behavior (if such a server was therefore advertising both 'foo' and 'foo/'). > But the issue isn't that; it's the specific case of name/% or name/* where > "name" exists as a non-terminal level of hierarchy but has no children. ...and is also a \NoSelect mailbox. > My argument basically says that if name exists, then name/% or name/% > should always result in non-empty LIST output. This still sounds like implementation-specific behavior to me. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski | Andrew Systems Group * Research Systems Programmer PGP:0x5CE32FCC | Cyert Hall 207 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * 412.268.7456 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK---- Version: 3.12 GCS/IT/CM/PA d- s+: a-- C++++$ ULS++++$ P+++$ L+++(++++) E W+ N o? K- w O- M-- V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5+++ R@ tv-@ b+ DI+++ G e h r- y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
