On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 13:48, Mark Crispin wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Michael Wener wrote: > > Session 2 > > <Ah Ha, I see I have new mail> > > There's your problem. You were informed of new mail in session 1, and you > assumed that this information is valid in session 2. It isn't. >
Yes, this seems to be the consensus. > You can not carry over state from one session to another. Where in the RFCs is this stated or implied? Also, obviously some state is carried over as stated in 2.3.1.1. So what state is and is not session affinitive? I see in 2.3.2 that flags are explicitly defined to have or not have session affinity. UIDs do not have session affinity. Mike
