Doesn't that assume that a "false positive" would be the same as a complaint?
Right now, I'm hand inspecting all of my policy rejects (but I don't have anywhere near 80,000 of them per day). I know the few false positives that I see (almost all from mailers who don't have rDNS set up right), would not be reported by my user base because they don't *know* that someone mailed them and it was rejected. Philosophically, though, I set this up to control UCE, especially the vulgar and pornographic type. NOT running an abuse@ address is not the same thing, IMO, as sending spam, and therefore, is not a policy item that I would necessarily use to say someone is not entitled to email my users. (Of course, the nice thing about policies are that you and I can have different ones.) - Byron -----Original Message----- From: Cybertime Hostmaster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMGate] Re: Current RBLS > I like that idea too, but that one gave me false positives like crazy Interesting, I get about 1 complaint every 2 months or 3 months for it. That is with an average 10K delivered mail a day. And now rejecting 80K a day. --Eric
