I have found that comm.charter.net has some valid business networks in it. I am not sure how wide spread this is.
DustyC On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 12:09:05PM -0500, Len Conrad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > >(charter) from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cpe-24-107-232-14.ma.charter.com > > Now you see why I expected that Scott would get on my case so hard about > this recommendation in the Imail list, and he did. His attack on my > recommendation smells like a self-serving hidden agenda. > > I doubt there's any good reason he can't relay declude.com's outbound > through his won ISP of Computerized Horizons, since that would go along > with my standard recommendation that legit mailers on subscriber networks > should do just that. > > >I've since excluded them... But is there a known good exception for (other) > >businesses with a connection via charter? > > That specific one is probably the only one common to this group. > > But don't buy my "preaching" as Scott calls it, just run in warn_if_reject > for a few days, identify any subscribers IPs that habitually send to your > MX (probably on the order of 1 in 1000 subsciber IPs that abuse you), > whitelist them (or prabably, "it"), and then move to reject mode. You will > still be way ahead with this cautious approach vs not doing it at all. > > And I assume that you have tested all your relay domains for all incoming > mail from Internet to postmaster@ and abuse@ actually showing up in > somebodys' mailboxes. This practice is of course not specific to the > subscriber filter. > > > Len > >
