>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/06/technology/06SPAM.html > >If you don't want to bother with that, the idea is to try earmark mail as >legitimate (the way habeas does) with some kind of certificate. excerpt: > >"The upper hand is probably held by the four largest service providers ><http://www.nytimes.com/redirect/marketwatch/redirect.ctx?MW=http://custom.marketwatch.com/custom/nyt-com/html-companyprofile.asp&symb=MSFT>Microsoft, > > >America Online, Earthlink and ><http://www.nytimes.com/redirect/marketwatch/redirect.ctx?MW=http://custom.marketwatch.com/custom/nyt-com/html-companyprofile.asp&symb=YHOO>Yahoo
oops, sorry about those URLs embedded in the paste from NYT, and invisible in my msg when sent. Len
