Andrew, I am making my first steps with SA Only in the company domain. Seems to work well, but with a trick for my: NEVER delete emails. Just scan, tags and let them go. The traffic increase, yeah. The complaints decrease. Only 3 FP in last week. The laws here are strictly.....inexistent regarding this... No regulation. But the lawyer here thinks that we must SEND the mail to the recipient, and as a value add, tag it. Then, the customer make a rule, if he want, to delete it.
Regards Andres.- ----- Mensaje original ----- De: "Andrew P. Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Enviado: martes, 14 de octubre de 2003 10:09 Asunto: [IMGate] Re: spamassasin and IMGate > > >>I'm planning to put spammassain on my virus scanner box. I will lower the > >>threshold on the primary IMGate box > > >why lower it? > > I have found that fighting SPAM can be a thankless job. If one photo of a > women and a horse sneaks by customers think the SPAM service is crap. Or if > on of their AOL users misspells their email address and they never get the > email they blame the SPAM filters. My thought was to ratchet down IMGate a > bit (perhaps remove one RBL) and then let SPAMASSAIN block. This way the > customers would SEE some of the blocked mail. Perhaps this is unwise. Hence > my request for comments on people using both IMGate and SPAMASSASIN. > > p.s. Now I'm blocking almost 5 million messages a month ! > > Andrew P. Kaplan > www.cshore.com > > You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness > consists of. You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of > life." -- Albert Camus > > > >
