On 8 Sep 2011, Vegard Øye wrote: > On 2011-09-06 21:51 +0200, Michael Markert wrote: > >> Because prefixkey C-h describes the keymap I think it's far more >> valuable to drop the vim compatibility here (esp. since C-w h >> does the same). > > I don't understand. What's the harm in binding "C-w C-h" to a window > command?
I thought the second part of the mail explained that: > Because prefixkey C-h describes the keymap I think it's far more > valuable to drop the vim compatibility here (esp. since C-w h does the > same). So C-w C-h would have shown what keys are accessible as C-w something. I can't find anything in the docs right now, but test C-x C-h (which is not bound, see C-h k C-x C-h) for example, and tell me if it's useful[1] ;) Footnotes: [1] Well the vanilla version isn't that great, but with anything and `descbinds-anything` it's great. Michael
pgp7egqFjZLPg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
