>> Because prefixkey C-h describes the keymap I think it's far more >> valuable to drop the vim compatibility here (esp. since C-w h does the >> same). > > So C-w C-h would have shown what keys are accessible as C-w something. I > can't find anything in the docs right now, but test C-x C-h (which is > not bound, see C-h k C-x C-h) for example, and tell me if it's useful[1] > ;)
I actually didn't understand either but now I get your point and I have to agree with you. > Footnotes: > > [1] Well the vanilla version isn't that great, but with anything and > `descbinds-anything` it's great. By the way, just out of curiosity, what does your Footnotes mean? York _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
