> Think of editing CSV files and you don't do the same every time so a > macro is not helpful. But moving to the next separator is. And I can > easily repeat it, hey even in the opposite direction in case I did > wrong!
True enough, being able to repeat in this scenario will be handy, then use ",," for "," for example maybe a compromise? > The shadowing part should be clear, but I'll drop an example: You shadow > `find-char' and have some tedious repetitious task, say with CSV files: > Find the third field and enter something. Unless you have some complex > data (e.g. escaped field separators), you're fine with a macro and > `find-char'. Again, maybe ",," can be a compromise. > I'm not saying that you go wrong here, just wanted to shed some light on > the issue. Sometimes you have to lose something in order to get something, this is life. York _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
