On 12/14/13 1:50 AM, Clifford Snow wrote: > > Eric Fischer got me thinking when he was working on a tiger fix that > we need to retain this data for future updates, even if we don't know > how to do updates today. Rather than use kingcounty:id, shouldn't we > have a consistent method of identifying tags that may be needed in the > future? It's possible just using :id is sufficient. However, maybe > something like update:id, although that has problems as well. > > Thoughts? > maybe
source:id richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Imports-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
