On 12/14/13 8:11 AM, Richard Welty wrote: > On 12/14/13 1:50 AM, Clifford Snow wrote: >> >> Eric Fischer got me thinking when he was working on a tiger fix that >> we need to retain this data for future updates, even if we don't know >> how to do updates today. Rather than use kingcounty:id, shouldn't we >> have a consistent method of identifying tags that may be needed in >> the future? It's possible just using :id is sufficient. However, >> maybe something like update:id, although that has problems as well. >> >> Thoughts? >> > maybe > > source:id belay that. needs more specificity, maybe
source:address_id richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Imports-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
