On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Eric Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:
> So far, the shapefile has the problems of duplicate nodes in one > specific neighborhood, and many nodes without house numbers. The good > news is that they have a separate KML file that doesn't have these > problems, but has the different problem of having only house numbers > without streets. So the plan is to cross-reference all points against > both files and reject any that don't match up. > We have a problem with duplicates as well. Here they are mobile home parks and apartment complexes. The county has a node for each building but all have the same address. We are working with the county GIS, who is also on our team, to see if it can be improved before we proceed. If you have a housenumber without street, you could do a query against the parcel data for numbers inside of the parcel polygon. > > Other than that, the nodes I've spot checked are good. What I just > wrote is also detailed in the proposal on the wiki. Now that I have > explicit permission from the city, I'll work on getting some chunks > processed and put on GitHub so others can take a look and see how the > quality is. > That would be great. Clifford -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Imports-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
