Derek Kniffin <[email protected]> writes: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Jackson, Dan" <[email protected]> > Date: Aug 30, 2013 8:18 AM > Subject: FW: RTD's GIS Data in OpenStreetMap > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Trujillo, Lisa" <[email protected]> > > Derek,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Please see http://www.rtd-denver.com/Developer.shtml**** >> >> ** ** >> >> If the intention is to provide a free service to the public, RTD’s Transit >> Data **** >> >> can be published on any interactive web map, similar to what others have >> done.****
> Is this good enough, or should he be more explicit? > > -Derek It's not good enough. While many people might do that with OSM, they might do many other things. We need a clear grant of license that is consistent with the Contributor Terms. It would be good to have a list of such approved license terms, but I'm having a hard time understanding how anything other than PD is ok now.
pgpDWlhVpXYj6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
