Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> writes: > Also worth noting that judging whether or not the data to be added > makes the "database better for the broad public" is not something that > the broad public will be able to do because they don't understand how > the project works. The broad public are likely to say "why, a database > with more data is certainly better than a database with less data > innit?" - you'd have to let the OSM community be the judge of what > they want to take on.
Agreed - I meant that the "better for the broad public" judgement should be made by people that are actively involved in OSM. I was holding up the Mass building import as something that fit that test - it had the support of all the active local mappers (that answered email at all).
pgpbiPOfFBefF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
