2014-05-05 19:17 GMT+02:00 Elliott Plack <[email protected]>: > Martin, thanks for pointing that out. I should clarify. I'm not against > this import so long as the community thinks boundaries are good for OSM. As > for the place=* tags, if there isn't a conflict in placing them both on the > boundary and a node, then so be it.
just to clarify, place tags should IMHO not go on administrative polygons if they do not coincide perfectly with the geographic extension of the settlement (usually only true for sub-areas like neighbourhoods, or in very densely built-up areas where the end of one settlement is the start of the next). Place tags should not go on areas outside of settlements (areas that are not built-up) but could encompass non-built-up areas in the inside of settlements (e.g. recreational areas, parks, brownfields etc.). cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
