On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 3:29 AM, malenki <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 29 May 2014 02:52:23 +0200 > Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> do you have a complete list of the tags that you propose to "drop"? > > key with count of occurrence:
> gnis:feature_id=* 26 > gnis:id=* 6577 The US community has discussed these tags and wants them to stay. Do not remove them. I'd call any removal of those vandalism. > water=lake;pond 57045 We don't go around removing thousands of tags because there is a new tagging scheme. I happen to like the distinction between lakes and ponds. In addition, Is see absolutely no value in a bot going around dropping tags just for the sake of dropping tags. Any gain in the reduction of the size of the DB will be accompanied by a larger increase of the size of the history by this bot going around modifying thousands of objects. You should be proposing that some of these tags (not all) be removed by the editors, which is how we typically handle these cases- not by brute force removal. I therefore vote against any such automated edit. - Serge _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
