Am Thu, 29 May 2014 11:22:31 +0200 schrieb Christoph Hormann <[email protected]>:
> On Wednesday 28 May 2014, malenki wrote: > > water=lake;pond > > One thing that bothers me about this is that with the new tagging > scheme for rivers (natural=water + water=river) Did I miss something? Where was the "new tagging scheme" proposed? Taginfo has 6 379 water=river 700 962 waterway=river 266 915 waterway=riverbank > there is no distinction between flowing and standing bodies of > water unless there is a water=* tag and here this information - while > being included in the original import - gets lost with the removal of > that tag. The majority of rivers is tagged with waterway=river, its banks with waterway=riverbank. > On the other hand the distinction lake - pond is somewhat pointless > anyway so i would suggest you simply change it to water=lake. That doesn't work. Some of the objects look like puddles on Bing, others are dry/intermittent. _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
