> It would be good to get something on the record from Dero that the license is ODbL, either an email or something public would work.
Per my proposal to Dero, the ODbL statement was embedded the map source code at http://www.dero.com/fixitmap/fixitmap.html That counts as public, makes the backing emails irrelevant, and nobody has to remember or document anything later. > There are some duplicate stations in the data Yes. The conflation process will catch these. I'm experimenting with a 40 meter radius for duplicate flagging. Dero's process leads to duplicates because of cell phone GPS uncertainty. > How will it be handled if a station is imported, then a subsequent import run finds it has been deleted? That's a tricky one. With the car share imports I run, if the car share company discontinues a location, that's the final word and it gets deleted from OSM. Here Dero's data collection method has no real mechanism for deletion, but ours does. So any dead stations will be fed back to Dero as an email. Chances are they know who they sold to in a particular city, and chances are the right thing will happen. >2015-01-23 4:00 GMT+01:00 Alex Barth <[email protected]>: >Ugh, ODbL license on the source data. If there's any way to get a different license for the imported data that'd be preferable. What would be better than ODbL? What downsides does ODbL have given OSM's use of ODbL?
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
