On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bryce, > > After reading through this thread, I just don't see this dataset as > being high enough of quality to import. > I see it as a great quality dataset : more than sufficient to locate the given feature on the ground. Note that some of the comments on this list regarding accuracy have been from armchair mappers. Analysis of press releases showed stations in the vicinity of the questioned pins, e.g. no problem. While it would be great if OSM mappers could move the pins to the exact right location, even if that never happens I see the data as an asset in OSM. The base map used was OSM from the start: this is already OSM data in a sense. This is no tiger import: the problems, if any, are small. There no evidence of a problem with this data.
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
