On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected] > wrote:
> > I agree that this tag is on the borderline, but I plea to keep it for the > reasons I mentioned before, I think they are an interesting piece in the > map that is a significant part in the whole picture > > cheers > Martin I think they're interesting also. But I think they'll be more visible, useful and appropriate as an overlap map. There's no particular integration with the OSM base layer. --- I doubt most of these sites can be surveyed: neither the underground ones nor the air blasts. The radiation plume is too dispersed in the case of air blasts. And what's next, mapping the extent of those? Mapping places where famous people talked about nuclear blasts? Mapping former sites of nuclear infrastructure?
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
