> > (Sites that will, unless they're mapped erroneously, *never* *ever*
> > change, because by definition these nodes refer to something that has
> > happened in the past which cannot be changed by anything that happens in
> > the future - unlike a house that can be torn down, or a boundary that
> > can be changed.)
>
>
> mountain peaks also hardly ever change within the dimensions of time we are
> looking at it, but I haven't heard a call yet to delete them.
>
> I agree that this tag is on the borderline, but I plea to keep it for the
> reasons I mentioned before, I think they are an interesting piece in the map
> that is a significant part in the whole picture
>
I agree. It does not cause any problems to keep this data, and it is
very small data set. Just keep it.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
