On Tuesday 16 June 2015, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Was the use of "raba:id" ever approved? I can't remember, it sounds a > bit funny.
It is not a feature id from the source data but a feature class. IMO it makes sense to keep such in case of more complicated feature class to tag translation, for example if different feature classes receive the same tag and later it might make sense to change or supplement these tags when tagging conventions are changed - of course only if there were not manual edits in between. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
