Hi, importers! First of all, sorry for the delay in handling this issue. We stopped the import immediately as the issue was raised, and disabled the import feature on our import tool (http://raba.openstreetmap.si ) Thank you for paying close attention to the activity in the OSM DB.
Some background: Initially we wanted to import the forest (generally "most prominent") features only. Some features were forest-like, in some areas other features were more prominent (vineyards, hop fields, rocks...), so we agreed to broaden the set of imported areas. We were discussing about whether to include farmland and meadows, and even made a survey in an attempt to gather more opinions to get to consensus and invited whole local community to participate ( http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=485625#p485625 ). In preparation for the survey we prepared the wiki page. The result were in favor of broader selection https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1-KgebKA7YPCxnVqvR5nl856OKDFGgu9xLMFgzAEeCPA/viewanalytics sample size is small (n=7, one user from the core import initiative admitted accidentally answering it twice in favor of forests only) Both (farmland and meadows)457%Farmland (only, no meadows)00%Meadows (only, no farmland)229%Neither (no farmland, no meadows)114% 85% of the survey participants were 6 of us, the core group of the import initiative, so we took it as a signal to make a broader import, and agreed on whatever features can be cleanly mapped to existing OSM tagging scheme and is accurately mapped in the forestry-and-farmland-specific source (from ministry of agriculture) As we came to the decision we were excited to prepare the data and to start importing, We needed your approval, but forgot to adjust the documentation with our latest decision. /background It is not a technical mistake in the import process, nor a malicious way to "smuggle" data past the review process. It is an honest documentation mistake, that unfortunately wasted your, reviewer's time. A co-importer just fixed the import wiki page ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Slovenia_Landcover_Import_-_RABA-KGZ ) and we're double checking every landuse type tags to make sure the wiki is correct. After wiki page is fixed, we'll let you know and ask for another review. Of course we will fix the already imported data, if needed. best regards, Štefan On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/16/2015 07:58 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > I have commented on > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31644282 and > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31935851, both of which I picked > > at random because they had raba:id=5000 objects in them, and requested > > that the matter be resolved before the import continues. > > It appears that the importers are working to a different specifiaction > than that which they had sought review on: > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31644282 > > I think that this invalidates the review and might require the reversion > of part or all of the import. > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
