From the responses received it sounds like we should first look at the licensing issue. I’d prefer not to make our TM and Data Agreement public but would be happy to send it to OSM's legal or those familiar the OSM license. If our agreement does not provide the necessary language I’d be happy to consider modifying the agreement within reason. I cannot remember a brand’s legal team having issues with their POI distribution, it’s alway about their IP (TM, SM etc). I wouldn't think that OSM would be interested in a brand’s IP which we would withhold.
:) agree it’s impossible to exceed expectations with mapping POI data. Best, jim > On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:41 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > >> Am 27.08.2015 um 17:56 schrieb Jim Stob <[email protected]>: >> >> My question to the community is would you be interested in importing our POI >> data if it met or exceeded your quality expectations? > > > If the license issues can be solved and the data is up to date, this sounds > very promising and I would be in favor of importing missing bits. > > Please be aware that it's impossible to exceed our quality expectations ;-) > > cheers > Martin _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
