2015-11-24 16:53 GMT+01:00 Andy Townsend <[email protected]>: > As an aside, it should perhaps be stressed that almost no-one (apart from > the person who suggested it above ) uses the tag "landcover=trees". ... >
actually someone has started adopting this scheme (I found it in areas where I never mapped), and I'm inviting everybody to join in. There's no good reason adding a landuse=forest to any arbitrary small group of trees, besides it has always been done. > I'm sure that it's fair to say that "natural=wood" is used _more_ to > describe "here be trees" than "landcover=trees". > yes, no doubt. The more interesting question would be: what does this tag imply. I am sure I would get more consistent answers from any 100 mappers I ask about their interpretation of the tag for landcover=trees and for natural=wood. cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
