colored stone <[email protected]> writes: > I think this isn’t really an error. This estimation based on analyses of > existing elements raba:id=1410 (currently classified as natural=heath) – > the question was – “how would OSM mapper classify this element according to > the satellite image”. More than 80% of this elements would be classified as > natural:scrub, some of them as landuse=forest (sometimes it is very > difficult to distinguish scrub from forest), very few as landuse=meadow > (1410 are former agricultural areas now overgrowth).
landuse=forest doesn't make sense to me for something derived from landcover. I realize this is not well agreed on. But basically landuse and landcover are separate concepts in geography, and I think it is not helpful to blur them. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest So if you have landcover data that says there are trees, that's natural=wood
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
