Hi Christoph, > On the whole the plan looks solid but it seems somewhat vague in some parts to me at this time: > - there is no information on tagging > - there is no assessment of the geometric accuracy of the source data > - there does not seem to be any abstract specification coming with the source data - it would be important to know if it complies with established OSM practice of building mapping, in particular w.r.t. what constitutes a single building and when there are two separate buildings and possibly building:part. > - it would be important to know what age and accuracy available image data sources have for the area of the import.
Most of the discussions wee in github tickets, we will transfer the summary in the wiki: https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues/35 > There are also some previous building imports in the area - like: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360076675/history Thanks for flagging this, I'm looking into this now: https://github.com/osmlab/labuildings/issues/53 > It would be a good idea to include cleanup of these with the import plan. Yes! -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ http://twitter.com/maningsambale ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
