On Friday 12 May 2017, Ilya Zverev wrote: > > First, I was amazed at the response. Thanks for constructive > feedback, which I answer below, and no thanks for toxic responses, > [...]
So you say you only consider comments you like and if someone points out that even though you have been involved in OSM long enough to know what is required of an import by the guidelines we have you did not follow them in several fundamental aspects and that this amounts to outsourcing work of maps.me to community volunteers whose job here normally would be to review a solidly prepared plan or suggests manually verifying each of the stations instead of an import you dismiss that as 'toxic responses'. This is not meant to say that all reactions here including my own have been a model of friendliness but the appropriate reaction if a comment appears non-constructive or inappropriate to you would be to directly reply pointing that out. Of course it is ultimately up to you how you handle this. A good way for you to get out of the mess you maneuvered yourself into here would IMO be to restart the whole thing from scatch by contacting talk-gb with the basic idea of the import and engage in an open discussion with the local community how to best make use of the data available and if an import is approved there prepare a solid work plan and restart review here with a detailed, transparent and well thought through plan that can be reviewed and approved without much hassle here. -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
