On 13 May 2017 at 21:40, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 13. May 2017, at 12:27, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote: [ on whether IDs like navads_shell should b included in imported data] >> A "clear no" in the sense that some of us think they're perfectly acceptable > I'm also against it, That does not negate my point. > for several reasons: > > 1) as a mapper you don't know how to deal with them because it is not clear > to what they refer (a single property, a combination of properties, the land > that has the tag, etc.), and how you should treat them when you modify > something None of the above. It's clear to me that it if refers to the mapped entity. Like any other tag does. > 1b) ultimately this raises complexity and might prevent cautious mappers from > improving the data that has these tags, because they don't know how to deal > with it This is hypothetical handwaving. > 2) it is circumventing the license: The licence for what? > this is proprietary data, which being made available under a suitable licence. > why would we want to distribute it Because it aids people who use or contribute OSM data. > (you can't use this data unless you have access to the proprietary part, it > is non-free data), Nonsense. > it's against the spirit of osm. Again: nonsense. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
