2017-07-04 10:32 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann <[email protected]>: > I don't think so. > > The buildings were just an example for possible incompatibilities. If > there are 200 of those there are almost certainly also at least several > hundred others - like the too close proximity to roads issue Rory > mentioned or other areas incompatible with the presence of trees. >
buildings and trees aren't incompatible, they are at most unusual as a combination (although I agree that superpositions of both merit an individual inspection). Trees on roads are admittedly less compatible, while on paths or footways they are likely OK. > > The english species names in the table seem wrong - AFAIK it is "Red > Oak", not "Oak Red" - see > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species > the species should preferably be tagged in latin, as this is usually the least ambiguous. Localized species are made possible as a convenience for mappers, but in an import I'd expect latin names. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
