Hi Martin, I did exactly that (removing buildings from the new dataset that are already on OSM). Thus, there shouldn’t be any conflict in that regard.
Thanks for your feedback! Michael Michael Wagner Geospatial Software Developer and Consultant allspatial - Geospatial Software and Services P.O. Box 4122, Anse Royale Mahe / Republic of Seychelles Web: https://www.allspatial.sc Email: [email protected] Mobile: +248-2601455 (SC) Mobile: +49-163-6386616 (DE) > On 7. Aug 2018, at 19:35, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > >> On 6. Aug 2018, at 18:18, Michael Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So we would prefer to import the buildings with the position/coordinates >> they have now. What is the experience from other places and common procedure >> if data to be imported has been traced on better imagery than what’s already >> on OSM? > > > I would not change the positions of your buildings to match better with the > current bing aerial imagery, but you should merge the existing stuff with > your dataset (easiest and safest is removing buildings from your dataset > where there is already a building in osm) > > > Cheers, > Martin >
_______________________________________________ Imports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports
