On 10/3/2022 1:10 PM, Marc_marc wrote:

in to what has already been said, a word of terminology: if you review each object and it makes sense for that type of object to "review it from a distance", then it is not an import.
How should I refer to it?
but as much as i want to believe that you look at the existence of 100 trees on the sat imagery, it seems hard to believe that this is what is actually done when there are 999. and especially there is not much in the opendata that is seen on the sat imagery

so instead of making a theoretical import plan covering all possible cases, take an example of a data set and talk about reality instead of theoretical hypothesis
I added a tightly reviewed set of the Cell towers database in Alabama awhile back. you can see the results on the OSM server: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mti


-James Crawford (SherbetS)


_______________________________________________
Imports mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports

Reply via email to