Thanks!

(Now I'm trying really hard not to ask when we'll see the new TF - I'm sure
we'll get it as soon as it's ready, and it'll be worth the wait.)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Randy Brukardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 9:21 PM
Subject: RE: TF exceptions


> > Well OK, that could explain problems I've had too.
> >
> > But what does TF do when there's no "Reply-To"?
>
> TF Classic uses the "Return-Path:" in the RCP file; it does not look
> *anywhere* in the MSG file. There is *always* a "Return-Path:" in the RCP.
>
> The RCP data can be found as "Mail From:" in Spameye, and in {} (if it
> differs) in the "From:" in the TF Viewer (if you have the beta of that).
>
> > Perhaps this is a suggestion for the next TF version then - either have
> separate
> > pass address lists for "From" and "Reply-To", or allow a single list to
> match either
> > field.
>
> The next TF has From, To, and Subject pass lists, and "From" is checked in
> both the RCP (Return-Path:) and MSG (From: and Sender:). That should make
it
> easier to use.
>
>                  Randy.
>
> This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software.
>   To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>             Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite
>            http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite
>                 Rock Solid Software (tm)
>

This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software.
  To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

            Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite
           http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite
                Rock Solid Software (tm)

Reply via email to