I employ Spamcop with one of my smaller mail servers, and it makes a huge difference. However, I have had problems with it rejecting legitimate mail every once in a while.
On a larger (~3000 mail accounts) mail system, I've been using the MAPS RBL+. While more spam gets through, it has never had a false reject. And most of the spam that gets through is from 'established relationships' that careless users have made by submitting their info to web sites. So it's all a matter of balance... in the setting where we don't have the manpower to deal with real mail being rejected, I opted for the more permissive, safer option. But Spamcop has been great with the smaller system that I can watch closely. Lars On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Ted wrote: > Is anyone on the list using Spamcop or another service like it? If so, are > there any likes or dislikes? > > I think my content filters need a little help. I have been concerned about > blocking good messages, so I always avoided these lists, but I'm not sure I > can continue to ignore them now. The volume of crap is just getting to > high. thanks for any responses. > > ted > > This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software. > To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite > http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite > Rock Solid Software (tm) > > This is the discussion list for the IMS Free email server software. To unsubscribe send mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered by Rockliffe MailSite http://www.rockliffe.com/mailsite Rock Solid Software (tm)
